However that is for the image center. For many lenses the edges perform best at f/5.6. And the 56 mm f/1.2 R is one of those with the edge sharpness beeing best at f/5.6. The studio scene with the new fuji has no more detail than the 30 mpix Canon r7 which has a heavy AA filter, with the rf 50mm 1.2. The studio scene with the Canon R5 and
April 9th, 2019. Sigma has once again managed to do for mirrorless what they seemingly cannot do with DSLR lenses - make an optically excellent, COMPACT lens. The Sigma DN 56mm F1.4 C is the 6th (by my count) of Sigma's DN line for APS-C (and Micro 4/3rds) mirrorless cameras. The first series were the ART primes (tiny 19mm, 30mm, and 60mm
Value For Money. This 56mm APD lens from Fuji costs around £1000, which is a 33% premium over the standard 56mm f/1.2, which costs around £750.Whether the APD filter will represent good value to
With the MkI 56mm f/1.2 I could use a square metal hood designed for the (I think) 23mm f/1.4, which was a nice package. I know it's not engineered to be as effective, but The new 56mm has a bayonet with a 67mm filter thread equivalent. I tried the square metal hood from the 16mm f/1.4, which has a 67mm thread.
The filter size is understandably wider at 62mm, and the barrel itself longer too at 70mm; the XF 56mm f1.2 is also double the weight at 405g vs 200g for the XF 50mm f2. Above left: Fujifilm XF 50mm f2. Above right: Fujifilm XF 56mm f1.2. I've pictured the XF 50mm f2 alongside the XF 56mm f1.2 above, without their lens hoods, and it's clear
Fujifilm XF 33mm f/1.4 R LM WR - Handling and Specs. Fujifilm has continued the design trend from the recently released Fujifilm XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR and had it not been for the differently shaped lens hood they look almost identical.. The XF 33mm f/1.4 R LM WR is, however, a bit smaller with its 58mm filter size vs. 62mm for the XF 18mm f/1.4 R LM WR, and with a weight of 12.7 oz, 360 g, and
PDOT. 457 458 125 494 310 322 132 251 89
fuji 56mm f1 2 filter size
